I have one rogue user who constantly creates, deletes,
and just does things in the system that are not
authorized causing tons of administrative work on my
end. Is there a way to allow this user ONLY to READ
everything from within SQL-EM, vs. writing or creating
anything. All this person does is Crystal reports, so I
might just remove the software altogether. But I'd like
to restrict rights because they'll definitely come tell
me that they couldn't do something due to restriction, at
which point I can bust them. Thanks!Don't give the user sysadmin privileges on the database.
Make this person a member of the datareader role in the database they need
access to and no other role membership other than public and no permissions
explicitly.
Bill
"CPS" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:14e2f01c3fa26$40d04c80$a001280a@.phx
.gbl...
> I have one rogue user who constantly creates, deletes,
> and just does things in the system that are not
> authorized causing tons of administrative work on my
> end. Is there a way to allow this user ONLY to READ
> everything from within SQL-EM, vs. writing or creating
> anything. All this person does is Crystal reports, so I
> might just remove the software altogether. But I'd like
> to restrict rights because they'll definitely come tell
> me that they couldn't do something due to restriction, at
> which point I can bust them. Thanks!|||Thanks!! How do I make sure they don't go into EM and
give themselves the rights back again?
>--Original Message--
>Don't give the user sysadmin privileges on the database.
>Make this person a member of the datareader role in the
database they need
>access to and no other role membership other than public
and no permissions
>explicitly.
>Bill
>"CPS" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
> news:14e2f01c3fa26$40d04c80$a001280a@.phx
.gbl...
I
like
at
>
>.
>|||If they don't have sa or dbo rights they wont be able to change permissions.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
<anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1567901c3fa5b$c5789d90$a501280a@.phx
.gbl...
> Thanks!! How do I make sure they don't go into EM and
> give themselves the rights back again?
> database they need
> and no permissions
> message
> I
> like
> atsql
Showing posts with label creates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label creates. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Lock out 1 user within Enterprise Manager
Labels:
administrative,
causing,
constantly,
creates,
database,
deletes,
enterprise,
lock,
manager,
microsoft,
mysql,
notauthorized,
oracle,
rogue,
server,
sql,
system,
tons,
user
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Location of logging for temp tables
I have a stored procedure that creates a temp table that is used to
insert data from a dynamic query. My question is does the logging of
the insert occur in the local database running the stored procedure or
does it occur in the tempdb database? My log file for local database
is growing significantly and I want to rule out that the temp table is
not writing to the local database log. I have done some testing and it
appears that is not but I just confirm my findings."Travis" <Travi424@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126279238.782948.112340@.z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
>I have a stored procedure that creates a temp table that is used to
> insert data from a dynamic query. My question is does the logging of
> the insert occur in the local database running the stored procedure or
> does it occur in the tempdb database? My log file for local database
> is growing significantly and I want to rule out that the temp table is
> not writing to the local database log. I have done some testing and it
> appears that is not but I just confirm my findings.
insert data from a dynamic query. My question is does the logging of
the insert occur in the local database running the stored procedure or
does it occur in the tempdb database? My log file for local database
is growing significantly and I want to rule out that the temp table is
not writing to the local database log. I have done some testing and it
appears that is not but I just confirm my findings."Travis" <Travi424@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126279238.782948.112340@.z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
>I have a stored procedure that creates a temp table that is used to
> insert data from a dynamic query. My question is does the logging of
> the insert occur in the local database running the stored procedure or
> does it occur in the tempdb database? My log file for local database
> is growing significantly and I want to rule out that the temp table is
> not writing to the local database log. I have done some testing and it
> appears that is not but I just confirm my findings.
An INSERT into the temp table will be logged in tempdb; an INSERT from the
temp table into a permanent table will be logged in that database.
Simon|||Thanks!
Monday, March 19, 2012
LocalReport.Render creates PDFs 10x the size of RS 2000
I'm using LocalReport.Render to create PDFs from my VB.Net 2005 application.
The resulting PDF is about 10x the size of the same report rendered from RS
2000. Looking inside the generated PDF file, I see that the main body of the
report is no longer using any compression.
Is there any way to force LocalReport.Render to use the compression that RS
2000 was using?This is a known bug:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=134219&SiteID=1
--
Robert Jeppesen
Durius
http://www.durius.com/
"davedave" <davedave@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7929FEFC-3427-4864-A817-B3A83269F92D@.microsoft.com...
> I'm using LocalReport.Render to create PDFs from my VB.Net 2005
> application.
> The resulting PDF is about 10x the size of the same report rendered from
> RS
> 2000. Looking inside the generated PDF file, I see that the main body of
> the
> report is no longer using any compression.
> Is there any way to force LocalReport.Render to use the compression that
> RS
> 2000 was using?
The resulting PDF is about 10x the size of the same report rendered from RS
2000. Looking inside the generated PDF file, I see that the main body of the
report is no longer using any compression.
Is there any way to force LocalReport.Render to use the compression that RS
2000 was using?This is a known bug:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=134219&SiteID=1
--
Robert Jeppesen
Durius
http://www.durius.com/
"davedave" <davedave@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7929FEFC-3427-4864-A817-B3A83269F92D@.microsoft.com...
> I'm using LocalReport.Render to create PDFs from my VB.Net 2005
> application.
> The resulting PDF is about 10x the size of the same report rendered from
> RS
> 2000. Looking inside the generated PDF file, I see that the main body of
> the
> report is no longer using any compression.
> Is there any way to force LocalReport.Render to use the compression that
> RS
> 2000 was using?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)